Fateh Law CorporationFateh Law Corporation Facebook ad: “NOT EVERY MISTAKE SHOULD MEAN A 5-YEAR BAN!”
Running for 11 days since October 13, 2026. Crush last saw it on October 24, 2026.
Run by Fateh Law Corporation on Facebook. Crush is not the advertiser and does not verify its claims. See this ad in Meta's Ad Library(opens in a new tab)
Make your own version of this ad
Crush makes it, launches it in your own Meta ad account, scales the winners and pauses the losers.
About this ad
- Meta Ad Library ID
- 1003521969428634
- Platforms
- Facebook and Instagram
- Relaunches
- 0
Ad text
🚨 NOT EVERY MISTAKE SHOULD MEAN A 5-YEAR BAN! When should an IRCC officer NOT make a Section 40 misrepresentation finding? IRCC’s historical ENF 2/OP 18 operational guidance provided examples of situations where misrepresentation would generally NOT apply—including circumstances involving genuine errors or honest mistakes. ⚖️ A mistake in an immigration application does not automatically mean that an applicant deliberately tried to mislead IRCC. More importantly, whether Section 40 applies requires a fact-specific legal analysis. In this Reel, Mr. Fateh discusses examples from the historical guidance where a misrepresentation finding may not be appropriate and explains why the individual circumstances matter. 📌 These examples are not exhaustive. Every case must be considered on its own facts, evidence, applicable law and current jurisprudence. Facing a Procedural Fairness Letter or Section 40 finding? Seek legal advice before responding. ⚠️ Historical guidelines shared for educational purposes only. Not legal advice. #Misrepresentation #Section40 #5YearBan #ProceduralFairness #fatehlawcorporation
