Skip to content
Chase Chappell

Chase Chappell Facebook ad: “NOW DO THE MATH ON YOUR AD SPEND.”

Chase Chappell Facebook ad: NOW DO THE MATH ON YOUR AD SPEND.

Ran for 12 days, from September 22 to October 4, 2026, the last day Crush saw it.

Run by Chase Chappell on Facebook. Crush is not the advertiser and does not verify its claims. See this ad in Meta's Ad Library(opens in a new tab)

Want an ad like this for your product?

Crush makes new ad images for your product from this ad: your logo, your product photo, your offer.

Trials from $19.95 USD, then $79.95 USD a month. Cancel anytime.

About this ad

Meta Ad Library ID
1396452932009681
Platforms
Facebook, Instagram, Audience Network, Messenger and Threads
Relaunches
2

How we count

Ad text

Let’s do some simple math… Say your brand spends $100,000/month on Meta. And you're acquiring customers at a $50 CAC. That's roughly.. 2,000 new customers. Now let's say you don't spend another dollar on ads. Same $100,000. Same product. Same Meta account. But you cut CAC by 41%. Your $50 CAC becomes roughly $29.50. Now that same $100,000 can acquire roughly.. 3,390 customers. That's nearly 1,400 additional customers… Without increasing your ad budget. And that's before we even talk about what happens when those customers.. Buy again. Get hit with email & SMS. Take an upsell. Buy a bundle. Subscribe. Or tell their friends. This is why CAC matters so fucking much. A lower CAC doesn't just make your Facebook dashboard look prettier. It changes the economics of your entire company. You can acquire more customers with the same capital. You have more room to scale spend. You can tolerate CPM increases your competitors can't. You can reinvest more aggressively. And if your backend LTV is strong… Every additional customer you acquire feeds revenue back into the machine. So how did the brand in this ad report cutting CAC by 41%? It wasn't some new campaign structure. It wasn't another targeting hack. And it wasn't because Meta suddenly decided to be nice to them. We changed what we were feeding Meta. We built a UGC automation flywheel designed to continuously produce creative at volume. Instead of finding a few random creators and hoping somebody makes a winner… We built a Creator Army around different: ICPs. Avatars. Demographics. Pain points. Use cases. Awareness levels. Angles. Then the system keeps moving. Creators come in. Product goes out. Content comes back. Meta tells us what's working. Winners get identified. Winning concepts get iterated. New variations go back into Meta. Again. Again. Again. Because your media buyer can only optimize what's sitting inside the ad account. Feed Meta 10 ads and it has 10 chances to find a winner. Build the infrastructure to systematically produce hundreds of meaningful variations… And you've changed the game you're playing. That's the difference between doing UGC and building a creative machine. If you're running a DTC or CPG brand doing $20k+ per month and CAC is climbing while your team struggles to produce enough creative… Click the link and book a call.

adsmastery.com

NOW DO THE MATH ON YOUR AD SPEND.

UGC doesn’t scale brands.. But THIS does..

Learn more: adsmastery.com(opens in a new tab)

More from Chase Chappell

See all Chase Chappell ads

Similar ads in Marketing & Agencies

See all Marketing & Agencies ads