Ad copy

Over the last 3 months, we ran an interesting experiment with Bitville's automated trading bot "Bitora" to find out if it's actually profitable. Below, I've attached screenshots of the monthly performance from 2 accounts. Here's what we found out: Account 1 (Trading style: Balanced) May: +$506 (36% WR, 107 trades) June: -$1,741 (22% WR, 110 trades) July: +$927 (37% WR, 70 trades) 3-month total: -$308 (-1.5% of starting capital) Total trades: 287 Account 2 (Trading style: Aggressive) May: -$111 (36% WR, 95 trades) June: +$143 (27% WR, 134 trades) July: +$1,443 (36% WR, 88 trades) 3-month total: +$1,475 (+7.4% of starting capital) Total trades: 317 Both accounts averaged around 31-33% win rate across the 3 months, which is standard for real professional systems that compound through favorable risk-to-reward ratios. The most interesting takeaway is that both styles ran nearly identical win rates, but the cumulative outcomes were very different. Aggressive was catching bigger winners when it won, which is what drove the outperformance. In June, Account 1 suffered heavy losses (-$1,741) as Bitcoin & the entire market moved in extremely choppy directions. A smart manual trader would rightfully turn off the bot in choppy markets/months, but we left it on for testing. The counterintuitive finding was that "Aggressive style" on Account 2 not only stayed nearly flat in June's unstable conditions (+$143 vs Account 1's -$1,741) but also became significantly more profitable in July. Aggressive's worst month drawdown was -$111 (0.56% of starting capital). Balanced's worst month drawdown was -$1,741 (8.71% of starting capital). Roughly 16x smaller downside on the Aggressive account over this sample. So far, "Aggressive style" has performed better overall in both returns and drawdown control. Our initial guidance was to recommend "Balanced" to inexperienced traders because it takes slightly fewer trades. Based on this 3-month data, we may reconsider that. Aggressive took only 10% more trades but delivered better returns with smaller drawdowns. We'll keep tracking before formalizing any change. Context: Both accounts started with $20,000 (testing capital, applicable to every registered user). To protect users, each account trades with a maximum of $2,000 margin per trade (at capital above $5,000), restricted to 2 concurrent trades. A starting capital of $3,000-$5,000 will produce similar dollar profits, which translates to a substantially higher percentage return at that account size. All details are available in the documentation: https://bitville.cc/bitora/docs We'll continue running this test for 6 months and share updated results across both accounts. If the pattern holds, we may be able to say Bitora is one of the more useful and profitable trading tools available to retail traders. PS: Bitora doesn't keep user funds. It trades on Aster DEX via API connection. Users remain in full custody of their funds.