Sierra Club Canada Foundation ad creative
Sierra Club Canada Foundation
Sierra Club Canada Foundation

Active· since Jul 5, 2026

74
days running
0
relaunches

Ad copy

YOU'RE PAYING FOR THIS PIPELINE THE "PRIVATE PARTNER" IS JUST A COVER: A pipeline is no longer tied to the Pathways Project and recent (underwhelming) electric intertie announcements come with NO new dollar figures attached. As Severson-Baker notes: “Alberta and Ottawa said any new pipeline would be privately funded... that promise was broken: a private company will cover just 10%. Taxpayers will front up tens of billions of dollars…. the second promise — that a pipeline would only move ahead if the Pathways project was also built — has also been broken. There is nothing in today’s MOU announced between Canada, Alberta and the Pathways companies that actually compels the companies to move forward with this project." Canada IS going to pay for another pipeline that both the Canadian and Alberta Government will 'invest in' and that will be constructed by the Trans Mountain Corporation - a federal Crown corporation: https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3993&reset=1 As CBC reports: "The [private sector Pembina] company has said it "shall have no at-risk development capital" at this stage, which likely means that, for the moment, it is not risking a substantial amount of money — if any." They have NO plans to buy it from the public (just as with Trans Mountain, see below). SPREAD THE WORD: The '4D chess' lie was an attempt to keep us all silent while a new pipeline was pushed forward - one that would need public financing. The latest claim that a pipeline is necessary for unity is another lie: Albertans do NOT want to see the public finance a new pipeline and supported a STRONGER industrial carbon price. Alberta also sees a strong majority (62%) in favour of government regulations to limit oil and gas corporations’ greenhouse gas emissions (with only 20% opposed). BUT the Federal Government severely weakened and delayed the Industrial Carbon Price and that could “decimate” vital green industries and jobs according to Canada’s Clean50 founder: https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3949&reset=1 Indeed "Six in 10 Albertans don’t want taxpayer money to support a new oil pipeline, and two-thirds say their province’s economy is too dependent on oil and gas... [and] 49% agree the federal government “should step in with policies of its own” if Alberta doesn’t do enough to address climate change, compared to 38% who disagree." : https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3967&reset=1 IF 4D CHESS WAS FALSE - on an oil pipeline that could cost Canadians massively - WHAT OTHER ACTIONS ARE FALSE? One thing we DO know for certain is that oil and gas expansion is not economically profitable. There was NOT enough future demand for oil and gas to justify a new oil pipeline nor new LNG projects before the Iran War. The war has convinced countries to go renewable even faster destroying even more demand (no amount of ‘trust’ will overcome that): https://www.sierraclub.ca/iran-oil-gas-profits-prices/ So if a new oil pipeline requires public financing then that means the public WILL pay the price for the pipeline and there won’t be any reward - just a bill to pay. Remember how Trans Mountain was going to be sold to a private entity? “Cabinet ministers and officials [originally] insisted they did not intend for the public to be the long-term owner…. [but now] Trans Mountain Corporation and its financial overseer are making a pitch to keep the controversial, $34-billion pipeline in government hands indefinitely,” The Energy Mix reports. Meanwhile, the Tyee reports that Trans Mountain’s profitability could be an “accounting illusion.” Climate policies like the Clean Electricity regulations have also been weakened and domestic oil and gas projects are still being heavily subsidized by the public - which will slow renewable energy adoption. Indeed, the government’s AI plan specifically aims to manufacture demand for burning more gas domestically as DeSmog reports (all while wasting water and raising power bills): https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3967&reset=1 Why? It was NOT for the sake of national unity, but to benefit a select few wealthy oil and gas interests, that are either owned by the U.S., or sympathetic to the U.S. interests and policies- like 'Build Canada': https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3979&reset=1 Indeed the entity that will construct, own and operate the assets of the Ksi Lisims LNG project is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Texas-based Western LNG, funded by U.S. private equity firms with ties to the U.S. Government. Likewise, the four companies that represent 80% of Canadian oil sands production 60% American-owned. They are sending a large share of their profits to their shareholders in the United States, even as they lobby to weaken Canadian climate policy: https://www.sierraclub.ca/lng-national-interest-canada/ By giving those U.S. oil and gas interests what they want we encourage them to keep pushing for even more and encourage them to sow even more division by showing that sowing division works. The idea all this was ‘4D chess’ was a falsehood, and you cannot build trust on falsehoods. If cuts to climate policy had been about national unity then why have pesticides also been de-regulated? De-regulating pesticides actually hurts Canada's ability to trade with other countries: https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3979&reset=1 Why have Parks Canada, Global Affairs, and DFO jobs and vital services like pharmacare been cut or rolled back so much that it actually weakens Canada's position relative to the U.S. and why is government thinking of privatizing public assets: https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3932&reset=1 Why does our government increasingly talk about being part of a ‘Fortress North America’ with the U.S.? A ‘Fortress North America’ that would run on oil and gas: https://www.sierraclub.ca/canadian-gas-ai-data-centres-keystone-xl-fortress-north-america/ & https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3963&reset=1 Why haven't we capped gas prices (which we could do) or taxed the excess profits of oil and gas corporations (an excess profits tax on oil and gas corporations has majority support from all regions and age groups in Canada - including Alberta): https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3971&reset=1 Other countries have already taken those measures in the past and failing to do so here could cost Canadians between $50 to $100 billion: https://centreforfuturework.ca/2026/05/17/a-sequel-we-dont-want-what-the-2026-oil-price-shock-will-cost-canadians/ Most of our gas comes from domestic sources, nothing about the cost of production or distribution has changed since before the Iran War (i.e. there's still plenty of incentive under a gas price cap): https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3916&reset=1 After all gas tax cuts do not work, oil and gas corporations simply raise prices to eat the benefit that was meant for consumers: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1402221788608911&set=pb.100064633093375.-2207520000&type=3 All while wildfires, severe storms, and heat waves get worse: https://www.sierraclub.ca/emergence-women-in-the-storm/ Climate policies - won by Canadian wildfire and flood survivors - were helping to send Canada in the right direction: a renewable one: https://www.sierraclub.ca/emissions-cap-climate-impact/ Renewable energy with battery storage does NOT need baseload power from gas plants and is far cheaper than other options: https://www.sierraclub.ca/renewable-energy-does-not-need-baseload-power-more-facts-on-wind-solar-batteries-grids/ Thanks to recent climate policy rollbacks Canadians will pay more for energy and green jobs will be severely reduced: https://www.sierraclub.ca/industrial-carbon-pricing-green-jobs/ The few government announcements around renewable energy have been underwhelming at best and seem to only be distractions to cover for oil and gas announcements: https://secure.sierraclub.ca/civicrm/mailing/view?id=3979&reset=1 Lowering climate targets - when you know that oil and gas interests will try to undermine those targets at every step - isn’t being realistic: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1433977358766687&set=pb.100064633093375.-2207520000&type=3 If all we do is say ‘yes’ to anything then we give up on values that protect Canadians and future generations. It’s okay to say ‘NO’ to climate destruction, it’s okay to say ‘NO’ to U.S. oil and gas interests, and it’s okay to say ‘NO’ to a world where Canadians pick up the bill for both. That’s not division, it’s a necessity for survival. Oil and gas from Canada is realistically no greener than anywhere else, indeed it can be worse. The Narwhal reports that “LNG Canada, the country’s first large-scale LNG export facility, might have flared more gas than any other plant on earth last year.” Carbon capture and storage, likewise, does not work: https://environmentaldefence.ca/2025/07/25/title-5-reasons-why-ccs-is-bs-bunk-science/ It also pollutes local communities here in Canada. Already LNG exports are having negative health outcomes locally with residents near LNG infrastructure reporting disturbing impacts: Business in Vancouver notes: “[A] “big black cloud of smoke” over the whole area. After he filmed the cloud on Sept. 11, Gaucher said his mother got a nosebleed, and he and his son developed a cough. “There’s many concerns around that big black plume,” said Gaucher. “Everyone around right now is talking about really severe allergies.” “My concern is what are we breathing in? What is it going to do to us? Nobody has answers.” The Narwhal also reports: “‘Worsening symptoms’: Kitimat registered nurse concerned increased reports of respiratory problems linked to flaring…. “Is there going to be, in 40 years from now or 30 years from now, the incidents of cancer going through the roof?” Godfrey [another resident] asked.” A majority of Canadians (58%) say transitioning away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy is more important than ever given U.S. aggression toward other countries- only 11% say it’s less important: https://www.sierraclub.ca/clean-energy-polling-canada/ If you want to take action then SPREAD THE WORD, call your MP and DEMAND NO NEW PIPELINE: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en Find sources at the links above.

🪄Crush AI

Like this ad? Make it yours.

Crush rebuilds this exact creative around your product — your brand, your colors, your offer — in about a minute.

More ads from Sierra Club Canada Foundation

Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
21 Days
-Reach
2Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
8 Days
-Reach
2Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Active
132 Days
-Reach
2Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Active
132 Days
-Reach
2Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
13 Days
-Reach
1Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
16 Days
-Reach
1Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
14 Days
-Reach
1Ads
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada FoundationSierra Club Canada Foundation
Inactive
19 Days
-Reach
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Facebook ad
Details
Sierra Club Canada Foundation Ad — Running 74 Days | Crush Ad Library