Ad copy

I did not cross-examine the trichologist who named the mechanism and then sold me three products that did not act on it. £1,343 later, the gap was still there. I am 51. I am a partner at a commercial litigation firm in Edinburgh. I have, on average, two trials a year that require a wig and a gown. I had thick hair through my twenties and thirties and into my forties. The official partnership portrait that hangs in the firm's reception is from 2017. The hair in that portrait is the hair I had, and the hair I had assumed I would continue to have. In the summer of 2023 I went down to the robing room of the Court of Session to gown up for an interim hearing. The robing room has a small CCTV monitor over the door that shows the corridor outside. The angle of the camera in the corridor — I have walked past it for nineteen years — catches the back of your head as you walk away from it. I caught a glimpse of myself walking towards the courtroom that morning. I had not seen the back of my own head from that angle before. I gowned up. I walked into court. I made my submissions. I went home that night and made a GP appointment. The GP at the New Town practice was professional and good. She ordered bloods — ferritin, thyroid, full hormone panel, vitamin D. Everything came back in range. The follow-up was a Thursday afternoon. Eight minutes. "You are perimenopausal," she said. "The hair often does this. There is nothing on the NHS for cosmetic thinning. Some women like Plantur — it is a caffeine shampoo, Boots stocks it." I bought it. £6.85. I bought a scalp serum from a brand the GP had not mentioned because it was at the till. £28. Two months later, when nothing had changed, I booked a trichologist in Stockbridge. £200 for the consultation. He took my history, scoped my scalp, and prescribed an in-house tonic at £58 a bottle, a 5% topical minoxidil to be applied morning and night, three sessions of low-level laser at £90 each, and a follow-up review at six weeks at £80. I had not paid £200 to be cross-examined about my maternal grandmother's hair. I had paid £200 for a name and a plan. The name was useful. The plan was a list of products. I ran the minoxidil for six weeks. My scalp itched and then flaked and the trichologist explained on the follow-up call that this was "a known tolerance issue." I stopped at the end of week six. £30 down. The tonic ran three months. £174. The laser sessions: £270. The follow-up review I attended. £80. In parallel, in the way that one does these things in parallel: Nutrafol at £79 a month for four months — £316. Viviscal at £45 a month for three months because a colleague mentioned it in chambers — £135. Biotin from Boots: £72. A laser comb from a brand whose website I closed without buying twice and then opened a third time on a bad evening: £232. Total, summer 2023 to winter 2024: £1,343. I added it up on a Sunday morning over coffee. I have been training paralegals for two decades to add up disbursements line by line. I had not added up my own. I had been treating each purchase as a discrete and small decision, which is what compounded purchases feel like at the moment of purchase. Laid out on a single piece of paper they did not look like a series of small decisions. They looked like a year and a half of being out of my own depth. The hair I had been losing was not dying. It was being silenced. In perimenopause estrogen falls. The estrogen floor that had protected the scalp for decades retreats. Local DHT activity at the scalp rises. DHT shortens the anagen — the growth — phase of the hair cycle. The follicle spends less time producing and more time dormant. The hair it does produce becomes finer and shorter. The follicle is not dead. It is silenced. To interrupt the silencing, the intervention has to occur at the scalp, where the DHT activity is happening. The trichologist in Stockbridge had used the word DHT. He had used it in the way one uses a technical term in conversation with a client one has decided is going to follow it. He had then prescribed a tonic, a vasodilator, and a course of light therapy, none of which acted on DHT. The gap was there, in the room, and I had not asked the question I would have asked any expert witness who left the same gap in cross-examination. I read the literature afterwards. Not all of it — I am a commercial litigator, not a dermatology registrar — but enough. 5-alpha-reductase. The anagen phase. The work on topical caffeine. The way the marketing of menopausal hair products had been organised around the idea of fortifying hair you already had, rather than around the idea of interrupting the chemistry that was telling the follicle to stop. Once I started reading the labels with the eye I bring to an opponent's pleadings, the labels said something very different from what they had been saying when I read them at the till. Plantur is a shampoo. Ninety seconds is not an intervention. The minoxidil opens vasculature. It does not block 5-alpha-reductase. It is the wrong drug for the right problem. Nutrafol and Viviscal are systemics. You swallow them. They cannot concentrate at the scalp. Biotin supports keratin. Useful for the hair that gets through; irrelevant to the gate. The laser comb is, at best, an adjunct. None of it was built around the mechanism. The mechanism is local. The intervention has to be local too. I found Mellenza through a friend at the bar, a senior counsel who had been on it for six months. She is fifty-four. She did not show me her parting. She told me what she had read about the mechanism and why she had decided to test it. I respected the framing. I ordered a bottle. Not a shampoo. Not a volumiser. Not a supplement. A topical wake-up call for follicles that have been chemically silenced for years. You spray it on the crown, the part, and the temples. Nightly. Caffeine to block 5-alpha-reductase at the follicle. Polygonum multiflorum root extract, drawn from Korean dermatology research on follicle proliferation. Arginine for microcirculation. Biotin to support the integrity of new growth. Ginger extract for anti-inflammatory scalp support. I started in February. Weeks 1 and 2 were unremarkable, which is what the box said they would be. The spray dried clear. The scalp tolerated it. I had been in trial preparation and had not been thinking about my hair, which turned out to be the right state in which to start. Week 4: less hair on the pillow. Week 6: the lengths felt heavier when I plaited them on a Sunday evening. My husband, who notices things in a different register, said nothing for a fortnight and then asked whether I had had it cut. Week 9: I took a photograph in the bathroom under the same overhead light I had used in February. The parting was narrower. I dropped my phone on the sink and then I picked it up again. Month four: I cancelled the trichologist follow-up. Month five: my daughter graduated from the University of Edinburgh. She walked across the stage in McEwan Hall in late June, under the painted vaulting and the high circular skylight. The official photographer caught the families afterwards in the quad. I stood next to my husband and our son for the family photograph. I did not tilt my head. I looked at the camera. My daughter put her arm through mine. We had a small lunch afterwards at a restaurant on Forrest Road that we had been going to since she was an undergraduate. The waiter who has worked there for as long as we have been going there took a photograph of the four of us on my phone in the same booth in which she had eaten her first lunch as a fresher. I keep the two photographs together on my phone now. The interval between them is not the interval I had thought it would be. The senior counsel I had got the name from rang me the day after the graduation. She had seen the photograph on a card I had sent. She said only that I looked well. From her, that is the entire review. Twelve weeks is the cycle the follicle needs to reassert itself once the silencing is interrupted. Mellenza ships from the UK with a 90-day money-back guarantee, a scalp massager, and an ebook with the routine. If you have been buying products that were not built around the mechanism — and that is most of us — try the one that was.