chrislynchpt Facebook ad: “Full report, all 5 supplements ranked →”

About this ad

Meta Ad Library ID

2082887982571138

Platforms

Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads

Relaunches

0

Niche

Supplements & Wellness

How we count

Ad text

I bought AG1. Here's what I found after 12 months of testing. Everyone's talking about it. Andrew Huberman. Every podcast you've ever listened to. Your gym buddy who suddenly became a wellness expert. So I bought it. As a food scientist, I needed to know if it actually holds up. Spoiler: it's not bad. But at $99 a month, "not bad" isn't good enough. Here's my issue with AG1. When you're paying a premium price, you deserve to know exactly what you're getting. AG1 uses proprietary blends — meaning they list the ingredients but hide the individual doses. You have no idea if what's inside is clinically dosed or just enough to put it on the label. For men specifically, it's missing almost everything that matters after 30. No shilajit. No meaningful boron. No maca. No cordyceps. The ingredients that support testosterone, recovery, and male hormonal health simply aren't there. So I spent 12 months testing the top 5 men's supplements on the market. AG1 included. I pulled every label apart professionally, tracked energy, recovery, and performance across 8-10 week periods per product. The results surprised me. The best formula I found wasn't AG1. It wasn't the one with the biggest marketing budget or the most famous endorsements either.

Where the ad sends people

mensperformanceguide.com

Full report — all 5 supplements ranked →

I've spent my career analysing what's actually in the products people consume — ingredient forms, bioavailability, manufacturing standards. I don't take brands at their word. I pull apart formulas. This is what 12 months of testing found.